Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/19847454
Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
5
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
2010-4-5
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
The choice of appropriate therapeutic plans for primary endocervical adenocarcinomas (ECA) and endometrial adenocarcinomas (EMA) depend on the tumor's site of origin. The purpose of this study was to compare the performances of the commonly used three-marker (ER/Vim/CEA), four-marker (ER/Vim/CEA/PR) and five-marker (ER/Vim/CEA/PR/p16INK4a) panels in distinguishing between primary ECA and EMA.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:chemical | |
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
May
|
| pubmed:issn |
1432-0711
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
| pubmed:volume |
281
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
845-50
|
| pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:19847454-Adenocarcinoma,
pubmed-meshheading:19847454-Endometrial Neoplasms,
pubmed-meshheading:19847454-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:19847454-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:19847454-Tissue Array Analysis,
pubmed-meshheading:19847454-Tumor Markers, Biological,
pubmed-meshheading:19847454-Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
|
| pubmed:year |
2010
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
A reappraisal of three-marker (ER/Vim/CEA), four-marker (ER/Vim/CEA/PR), and five-marker (ER/Vim/CEA/PR/p16INK4a) panels in the diagnostic distinction between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray study.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chung-Shan Medical University Hospital, and Institute of Medicine, Chung-Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan. hanhaly@gmail.com
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Evaluation Studies
|