Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1991-1-18
pubmed:abstractText
Patients, families, and physicians frequently decide that a hospitalized patient will forgo cardiopulmonary resuscitation and document this decision with a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order. In community settings (home, nursing home, hospice), these orders may conflict with paramedics' standing orders to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation whenever it is medically indicated. We did a nationwide telephone survey of state offices for coordination of emergency medical services (EMS) to see how the states deal with this potential conflict. We identified eight states that have specific policies enabling EMS personnel to accept DNR orders for patients being transported by ambulance. State officials identified administrative complexities and legal concerns as the primary barriers to enacting prehospitalization DNR policies. We also identified 21 local EMS systems that have developed policies for accepting orders to withhold life-sustaining treatment. Four types of policy models, characterized according to procedure for validating DNR orders and telephone accessing the EMS system, show that regulatory reform can address policy barriers in the absence of enabling legislation.
pubmed:keyword
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
0003-4819
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
15
pubmed:volume
114
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
151-4
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1991
pubmed:articleTitle
Limiting resuscitation: emerging policy in the emergency medical system.
pubmed:affiliation
Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Illinois.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't