Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/19733989
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
1-3
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2009-10-5
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Forensic anthropologists are frequently asked to assess partial or badly damaged skeletal remains. One such request led us to compare the predictive accuracy of different mathematical methods using four non-standard measurements of the proximal femur (trochanter-diaphysis distance (TD), greater-lesser trochanter distance (TT), greater trochanter width (TW) and trochanter-head distance (TH)). These measurements were taken on 76 femurs (38 males and 38 females) of French individuals. Intra- and inter-observer trials did not reveal any significant statistical differences. The predictive accuracy of three models built using linear and non-linear modelling techniques was compared: discriminant analysis, logistic regression and neural network. The neural network outperformed discriminant analysis and, to a lesser extent, logistic regression. Indeed, the best results were obtained with a neural network that correctly classified 93.4% of femurs, with similar results in males (92.1%) and females (94.7%). Univariate functions were less accurate (68-88%). Discriminant analysis and logistic regression, both using all four variables, led to slightly better results (88.2% and 89.5%, respectively). In addition, all the models, save the neural network, led to unbalanced results between males and females. In conclusion, the artificial neural network is a powerful classification technique that may improve the accuracy rate of sex determination models for skeletal remains.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Nov
|
pubmed:issn |
1872-6283
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:day |
20
|
pubmed:volume |
192
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
127.e1-6
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:19733989-Aged, 80 and over,
pubmed-meshheading:19733989-Discriminant Analysis,
pubmed-meshheading:19733989-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:19733989-Femur,
pubmed-meshheading:19733989-Forensic Anthropology,
pubmed-meshheading:19733989-France,
pubmed-meshheading:19733989-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:19733989-Logistic Models,
pubmed-meshheading:19733989-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:19733989-Neural Networks (Computer),
pubmed-meshheading:19733989-Sex Determination by Skeleton
|
pubmed:year |
2009
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
A comparison between neural network and other metric methods to determine sex from the upper femur in a modern French population.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Edhec Business School, 400 Promenade des Anglais, Nice, France.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|