Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
9
pubmed:dateCreated
2009-9-3
pubmed:abstractText
This study assesses the relation between the anhepatic phase duration and the outcome after liver transplantation. Of 645 patients who underwent transplantation between 1994 and 2006, 194 were recipients of consecutive adult primary piggyback liver transplants using heart-beating donors. The anhepatic phase was defined as the time from the physical removal of the liver from the recipient to recirculation of the graft. Other noted study variables were the cold and warm ischemia times, donor and recipient age, donor and recipient body mass index, perioperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, indication for transplantation, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score. The primary outcome parameter was graft dysfunction, which was defined as either primary nonfunction or initial poor function according to the Ploeg-Maring criteria. The median anhepatic phase was 71 minutes (37-321 minutes). Graft dysfunction occurred in 27 patients (14%). Logistic regression analysis showed an anhepatic phase over 100 minutes [odds ratio (OR), 4.28], a recipient body mass index over 25 kg/m(2) (OR, 3.21), and perioperative RBC transfusion (OR, 3.04) to be independently significant predictive factors for graft dysfunction. One-year patient survival in patients with graft dysfunction was 67% versus 92% in patients without graft dysfunction (P < 0.001). A direct relation between the anhepatic phase duration and patient survival could, however, not be established. In conclusion, this study shows that liver transplant patients with an anhepatic phase over 100 minutes have a higher incidence of graft dysfunction. Patients with graft dysfunction have significantly worse 1-year patient survival.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
1527-6473
pubmed:author
pubmed:copyrightInfo
(c) 2009 AASLD.
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
15
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1050-5
pubmed:dateRevised
2010-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:19718649-Adolescent, pubmed-meshheading:19718649-Adult, pubmed-meshheading:19718649-Aged, pubmed-meshheading:19718649-Body Mass Index, pubmed-meshheading:19718649-Cold Ischemia, pubmed-meshheading:19718649-Erythrocyte Transfusion, pubmed-meshheading:19718649-Female, pubmed-meshheading:19718649-Hepatectomy, pubmed-meshheading:19718649-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:19718649-Incidence, pubmed-meshheading:19718649-Kaplan-Meier Estimate, pubmed-meshheading:19718649-Liver Transplantation, pubmed-meshheading:19718649-Logistic Models, pubmed-meshheading:19718649-Male, pubmed-meshheading:19718649-Middle Aged, pubmed-meshheading:19718649-Odds Ratio, pubmed-meshheading:19718649-Primary Graft Dysfunction, pubmed-meshheading:19718649-Risk Assessment, pubmed-meshheading:19718649-Risk Factors, pubmed-meshheading:19718649-Time Factors, pubmed-meshheading:19718649-Treatment Outcome, pubmed-meshheading:19718649-Warm Ischemia, pubmed-meshheading:19718649-Young Adult
pubmed:year
2009
pubmed:articleTitle
The clinical relevance of the anhepatic phase during liver transplantation.
pubmed:affiliation
Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. a.j.c.ijtsma@chir.umcg.nl
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article