Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/19717948
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
3
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2009-8-31
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Different techniques and choices exist for revision of pedicle screws, two of which are pedicle screw combined with cement augmentation and expansive pedicle screw fixation. This biomechanical study was designed to compare the pullout strengths of two different revision techniques.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
1017-995X
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
43
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
272-6
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:19717948-Animals,
pubmed-meshheading:19717948-Bone Screws,
pubmed-meshheading:19717948-Cattle,
pubmed-meshheading:19717948-Compressive Strength,
pubmed-meshheading:19717948-Equipment Design,
pubmed-meshheading:19717948-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:19717948-Lumbar Vertebrae,
pubmed-meshheading:19717948-Polymethyl Methacrylate
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
[A biomechanical comparison of polymethylmethacrylate-reinforced and expansive pedicle screws in pedicle-screw revisions].
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Gaziosmanpasa University Medical School, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Tokat,Turkey. borabostan@gmail.com
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|