Linked Life Data

1958678

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/1958678

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5 Pt 1
pubmed:dateCreated
1992-1-7
pubmed:abstractText
To determine the effects of donor/recipient weight mismatch on allograft function and survival after orthotopic heart transplantation, we retrospectively compared the clinical and the hemodynamic characteristics of recipients weighing more than their donor ("undersized") with those of recipients weighing less than their donor ("oversized"). The median follow-up period was 24 months (range, 0 to 67 months). In 88 patients (59%) donor weight was 1% to 46% less than recipient weight (13.5 +/- 8.9 means +/- SD). In 61 patients (41%) donor weight exceeded recipient weight by 0% to 139% (20% +/- 23%). When recipient ideal body weight was used in the analysis, 75 patients (51%) were undersized by 1% to 59% (13% +/- 10%), and 72 patients (49%) were oversized by 0% to 67% (19% +/- 18%). Preoperative transpulmonary gradient, ventricular function, and exercise tolerance were similar in the two groups. The number and severity of episodes of rejection and infection after transplantation were also similar in the two groups 1, 6, and 12 months after transplantation. When recipient ideal weight was used in the analysis, right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) ejection fractions (EFs) were within normal limits (RVEF greater than 40%; LVEF greater than or equal to 45%) and similar in the two groups. When recipient actual weight was used in the analysis, the LVEF measured at 12 months after heart transplantation was higher in the oversized than in the undersized group (52 +/- 11 vs 46 +/- 10; p less than 0.05). Postoperative hemodynamic values and exercise tolerance were similar in the two groups regardless of whether recipient weight or ideal body weight were used in the analysis. Forty-six recipients died 0 to 46 months (median, 7 months) after orthotopic heart transplantation. In a Cox regression model, recipients with donor weight greater than recipient ideal weight had a significantly greater risk of death within the follow-up period than did recipients with donor weight less than recipient ideal weight (relative risk = 2.19; p less than 0.05). When percent donor weight/recipient ideal weight mismatch was used as a continuous variable, donor heart oversizing was negatively related to survival, independent of preoperative transpulmonary gradient values (p less than 0.05). In contrast to common belief, oversizing of donor hearts does not improve the outcome of orthotopic heart transplant recipients who have reversible preoperative pulmonary hypertension. Acceptance of undersized donor hearts is not detrimental to allograft function and recipient survival. Use of undersized donor hearts may maximize the use of critically scarce donor organs.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
1053-2498
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
10
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
N
pubmed:pagination
717-30
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
Oversizing of donor hearts: beneficial or detrimental?
pubmed:affiliation
Section of Cardiology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Ill 60153.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study