Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
1991-12-30
pubmed:abstractText
The present study was designed to assess the extent to which the effects of feed-back (FB) and time windows, on the RTs of closed-head-injured outpatients, might carry-over when these external cues were removed. RT and evoked potentials were recorded while 12 closed-head-injured outpatients and 12 matched controls performed an auditory discrimination task. The FB and time windows were provided on three trials, then gradually removed. Following the removal of the FB and windows, patient RTs remained significantly faster and were approximately equal to the RTs of controls prior to the presentation of the cues. As in controls, the RTs of patients following removal of the cues occurred at approximately the same time as their P300s (the latency of this event-related potential component is thought to index stimulus evaluation time). To this extent, patient RTs did not appear to be exaggerated beyond the time needed for stimulus evaluation. The results obtained, therefore, provided tentative evidence that the experimental manipulation might have a lasting effect on CHI patient RTs.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
1380-3395
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
13
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
639-51
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-4-14
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1991
pubmed:articleTitle
Decision-making following closed-head injury: can response speed be retrained?
pubmed:affiliation
University of Ottawa.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't