Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
2010-4-19
pubmed:databankReference
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690040, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690041, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690042, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690043, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690044, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690045, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690046, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690047, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690048, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690049, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690050, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690051, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690052, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690053, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690054, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690055, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690056, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690057, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690058, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690059, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690060, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690061, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690062, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690063, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690064, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690065, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690066, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690067, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690068, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690069, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690070, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690071, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690072, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690073, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690074, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690075, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690076, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690077, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690078, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690079, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690080, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690081, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690082, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690083, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690084, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690085, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690086, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/AM690087
pubmed:abstractText
Gut fungal-specific PCR primers have been used to selectively amplify the ITS1 region of gut fungal rDNA recovered from faeces of domestic and wild animals to investigate population diversity. Two different gel-based methods are described for separating populations of gut fungal rDNA amplicons, namely (1) denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and (2) separation according to small size differences using Spreadex, a proprietary matrix for electrophoresis. Gut fungal populations were characterised by analysis of rDNA in faeces of seventeen domesticated and ten wild herbivores. Sequences derived from these gel-based characterisations were analysed and classified using a hidden Markov model-based fingerprint matching algorithm. Faecal samples contained a broad spectrum of fungi and sequences from five of the six recognised genera were identified, including Cyllamyces, the most recently described gut fungal genus, which was found to be widely distributed in the samples. Furthermore, four other novel groupings of gut fungal sequences were identified that did not cluster with sequences from any of the previously described genera. Both gel- and sequence- based profiles for gut fungal populations suggested a lack of geographical restriction on occurrence of any individual fungal type.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
1095-8274
pubmed:author
pubmed:copyrightInfo
Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
16
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
66-73
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2010
pubmed:articleTitle
Diversity of anaerobic gut fungal populations analysed using ribosomal ITS1 sequences in faeces of wild and domesticated herbivores.
pubmed:affiliation
Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystywth, Ceredigion SY23 3EB, UK.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't