Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
2009-11-12
pubmed:abstractText
This article examines the attitudes of 97 women from the St. Louis City Drug Court who previously participated in an HIV prevention study. Data from the previous study indicated that the women met multiple criteria for vulnerability in research. Federal regulations require that such participants be provided with "additional safeguards." The survey explored the following questions: (1) What are participants' attitudes toward commonly proposed additional safeguards for vulnerable participants in research, and (2) Are attitudes toward safeguards related to participants' previous compliance with an HIV prevention protocol? Preferences regarding safeguards in research were not significantly related to participants' compliance in the previous study. Most participants wanted researchers to take extra measures not only to provide consent information, but to ensure that they are not high on drugs, that they understand relevant information, and that they retain consent information at each visit. Most participants wanted researchers themselves, and not a third party, to assume this responsibility.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
1573-6695
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
10
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
345-52
pubmed:dateRevised
2011-5-4
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2009
pubmed:articleTitle
The attitudes of females in drug court toward additional safeguards in HIV prevention research.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA. duboisjm@slu.edu
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural