Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/19430952
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2010-2-4
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The objective of this study was to evaluate incremental cost-utility of total knee replacement (TKR) versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) of the medial compartment. A 2-year non-randomised prospective observational cohort study was conducted in unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis patients scheduled for TKR (n = 431) or UKA (n = 102). Costs were identified using administrative databases and health outcomes were measured using the SF-36 and the Oxford knee score (OKS) 1 week before, 6 months after, and 2 years after surgery. The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) for TKR versus UKA was calculated and its 95% confidence interval estimated using a nonparametric bootstrapping technique. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were constructed from different perspectives. On average, from the societal perspective, the ICUR was US $65,245 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). In the scenario with costs calculated from the perspective of patients, the ICUR was $60,382/QALY. This value decreased to $4,860/QALY in the scenario with costs calculated from the governmental perspective. However, the 95% confidence interval of ICURs cannot be defined because more than 5% bootstrapped samples fell into the upper left quadrant of the cost-effectiveness plane from all three perspectives. Based on the 2-year data, TKR gained more QALYs at higher costs compared to UKA. A long-term prospective study is necessary to determine cost-effectiveness of TKR and UKA.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Feb
|
pubmed:issn |
1618-7601
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
11
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
27-34
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:19430952-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:19430952-Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee,
pubmed-meshheading:19430952-Confidence Intervals,
pubmed-meshheading:19430952-Cost-Benefit Analysis,
pubmed-meshheading:19430952-Databases, Factual,
pubmed-meshheading:19430952-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:19430952-Health Status Indicators,
pubmed-meshheading:19430952-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:19430952-Length of Stay,
pubmed-meshheading:19430952-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:19430952-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:19430952-Osteoarthritis, Knee,
pubmed-meshheading:19430952-Prospective Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:19430952-Singapore
|
pubmed:year |
2010
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Total or partial knee replacement? Cost-utility analysis in patients with knee osteoarthritis based on a 2-year observational study.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH) Research Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada. fengxie@mcmaster.ca
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|