Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
7
pubmed:dateCreated
2009-6-8
pubmed:abstractText
Laparoscopic surgery has become popular during the last decade, mainly because it is associated with fewer postoperative complications than the conventional open approach. It remains unclear, however, if this benefit is observed after laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer (PPU). The goal of the present study was to evaluate whether laparoscopic closure of a PPU is as safe as conventional open correction.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19430829-10415208, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19430829-10658061, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19430829-10974148, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19430829-11882751, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19430829-12960721, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19430829-15048752, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19430829-15136924, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19430829-15724004, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19430829-16041553, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19430829-16132404, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19430829-16211440, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19430829-16222472, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19430829-16226957, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19430829-16247571, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19430829-16544084, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19430829-2145052, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19430829-2400306, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19430829-3568820, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/19430829-8757375
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jul
pubmed:issn
1432-2323
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
33
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1368-73
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:19430829-Adult, pubmed-meshheading:19430829-Aged, pubmed-meshheading:19430829-Aged, 80 and over, pubmed-meshheading:19430829-Female, pubmed-meshheading:19430829-Follow-Up Studies, pubmed-meshheading:19430829-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:19430829-Intraoperative Complications, pubmed-meshheading:19430829-Laparoscopy, pubmed-meshheading:19430829-Laparotomy, pubmed-meshheading:19430829-Length of Stay, pubmed-meshheading:19430829-Male, pubmed-meshheading:19430829-Middle Aged, pubmed-meshheading:19430829-Pain, Postoperative, pubmed-meshheading:19430829-Pain Measurement, pubmed-meshheading:19430829-Peptic Ulcer Perforation, pubmed-meshheading:19430829-Postoperative Complications, pubmed-meshheading:19430829-Probability, pubmed-meshheading:19430829-Risk Assessment, pubmed-meshheading:19430829-Statistics, Nonparametric, pubmed-meshheading:19430829-Treatment Outcome
pubmed:year
2009
pubmed:articleTitle
Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of the perforated peptic ulcer: the LAMA Trial.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands. doc.bert@orange.nl
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Multicenter Study