Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
1991-12-12
pubmed:abstractText
MOD cavity preparations in 64 endodontically treated premolars were restored using four different methods. Copper rings were filled with commercial hard-setting cement and the teeth were placed into the cement up to the level of the cementoenamel junction. The teeth were grouped according to restorative method, mounted in an Instrom T.T. machine, and the buccal walls subjected to a slowly increasing compressive force until fracture occurred. The force of fracture of the walls of each tooth was recorded and the results in the various groups compared. All teeth fractured in a similar manner irrespective of the restorative method used. The resistance to fracture of the teeth was the same when they were restored with glass ionomer cement as a base over which an amalgam or composite resin was placed or with acid-etched resin. When the entire cavities were filled with glass ionomer cement the resistance to fracture of the teeth decreased significantly compared with the acid etch resin technique.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
D
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jun
pubmed:issn
0099-2399
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
17
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
257-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1991
pubmed:articleTitle
Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with glass ionomer cement or acid etch composite resin.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Endodontology, Temple University School of Dentistry, Philadelphia.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study