Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/19375687
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2009-4-27
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Theories that postulate cognitive inhibition are very common in psychology and cognitive neuroscience [e.g., Hasher, L., Lustig, C., & Zacks, R. T. (2007). Inhibitory mechanisms and the control of attention. In A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. Kane, A. Miyake, A. Towse, & J. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 227-249). New York, NY: Oxford, University Press], although they have recently been severely criticized [e.g., MacLeod, C. M., Dodd, M. D., Sheard, E. D., Wilson, D. E., & Bibi, U. (2003). In opposition to inhibition. In H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 43, pp. 163-214). Elsevier Science]. This paper poses and attempts to answer the question whether a research program with cognitive inhibition as its main theoretical assumption is still worth pursuing. We present a set of empirical data from a modified Stroop paradigm that replicates previously reported findings. These findings refer to between-trial effects previously described in the literature on Stroop, negative priming, and inhibition-of-return. Existing theoretical accounts fail to explain all these effects in an integrated way. A repetition-suppression mechanism is proposed in order to account for these data. This mechanism is instantiated as a computational cognitive model. The theoretical implications of this model are discussed.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
May
|
pubmed:issn |
1873-6297
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
131
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
72-84
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:19375687-Adolescent,
pubmed-meshheading:19375687-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:19375687-Attention,
pubmed-meshheading:19375687-Cognition,
pubmed-meshheading:19375687-Cues,
pubmed-meshheading:19375687-Decision Making,
pubmed-meshheading:19375687-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:19375687-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:19375687-Inhibition (Psychology),
pubmed-meshheading:19375687-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:19375687-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:19375687-Perceptual Masking,
pubmed-meshheading:19375687-Reaction Time,
pubmed-meshheading:19375687-Stroop Test,
pubmed-meshheading:19375687-Young Adult
|
pubmed:year |
2009
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
A repetition-suppression account of between-trial effects in a modified Stroop paradigm.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Psychology, Baker Hall, 336A, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. ijuvina@cmu.edu
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
|