Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
2009-4-1
pubmed:abstractText
Due to the Eurotransplant organ allocation policy, urgency listing for heart transplantation (HTx) remains in force until ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation in Germany. We studied the prognosis of HTx candidates after failed donor heart allocation in urgent status. We studied all adult and pediatric (<18 years) HTx candidates who underwent primary HTx after Eurotransplant urgency listing between January 2001 and December 2006 (Group A-uHTx [A-"u"rgent status "HTx"], n = 99; Group P-uHTx [P-"u"rgent status "HTx"], n = 24) and those to whom donor heart was not urgently allocated before VAD implantation or death in the same period (Group A-fHA [A-"f"ailed "H"eart "A"llocation], n = 21, Group P-fHA [P-"f"ailed "H"eart "A"llocation], n = 10). Mortality rate after urgency listing or primary VAD implantation was studied in each group. In adult patients, 1-year mortality rate after urgency listing in Group A-fHA was 56.8% and significantly higher than in Group A-uHTx (30.6%, P < 0.001, log-rank test). After failed urgent heart allocation, 15 out of 21 patients in Group A-fHA had VAD implantation and two patients (9.5%) underwent HTx after VAD implantation. In pediatric patients, 1-year mortality rate in Group P-fHA was 40.0% and significantly higher than in Group P-uHTx (8.5%, P < 0.05). In Group P-fHA, all 10 patients underwent VAD implantation after failed urgent heart allocation and six patients (60.0%, P < 0.01 vs. Group A-fHA, Fisher's exact test) underwent HTx after VAD implantation. After failed urgent donor heart allocation, pediatric HTx candidates seem to profit more from mechanical circulatory support than adults.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
1525-1594
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
33
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
346-51
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:19335411-Adolescent, pubmed-meshheading:19335411-Adult, pubmed-meshheading:19335411-Aged, pubmed-meshheading:19335411-Child, pubmed-meshheading:19335411-Child, Preschool, pubmed-meshheading:19335411-Critical Illness, pubmed-meshheading:19335411-Female, pubmed-meshheading:19335411-Germany, pubmed-meshheading:19335411-Health Policy, pubmed-meshheading:19335411-Heart Failure, pubmed-meshheading:19335411-Heart Transplantation, pubmed-meshheading:19335411-Heart-Assist Devices, pubmed-meshheading:19335411-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:19335411-Infant, pubmed-meshheading:19335411-Male, pubmed-meshheading:19335411-Middle Aged, pubmed-meshheading:19335411-Patient Selection, pubmed-meshheading:19335411-Risk Assessment, pubmed-meshheading:19335411-Severity of Illness Index, pubmed-meshheading:19335411-Time Factors, pubmed-meshheading:19335411-Tissue and Organ Procurement, pubmed-meshheading:19335411-Treatment Outcome, pubmed-meshheading:19335411-Young Adult
pubmed:year
2009
pubmed:articleTitle
Pediatric heart transplant candidates with failed donor heart allocation after Eurotransplant urgency listing profit from pretransplant mechanical circulatory support bridging.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany. komoda@dhzb.de
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study