Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1991-12-17
pubmed:keyword
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
E
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
1046-7890
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
2
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
19-22; discussion 23-4
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:1932792-Ethics, Medical, pubmed-meshheading:1932792-Female, pubmed-meshheading:1932792-Fetus, pubmed-meshheading:1932792-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:1932792-Judicial Role, pubmed-meshheading:1932792-Maternal Welfare, pubmed-meshheading:1932792-Maternal-Fetal Relations, pubmed-meshheading:1932792-Organizational Policy, pubmed-meshheading:1932792-Paternalism, pubmed-meshheading:1932792-Personal Autonomy, pubmed-meshheading:1932792-Physician-Patient Relations, pubmed-meshheading:1932792-Pregnancy, pubmed-meshheading:1932792-Pregnant Women, pubmed-meshheading:1932792-Prenatal Care, pubmed-meshheading:1932792-Risk Assessment, pubmed-meshheading:1932792-Social Values, pubmed-meshheading:1932792-Societies, Medical, pubmed-meshheading:1932792-Treatment Refusal, pubmed-meshheading:1932792-United States
pubmed:year
1991
pubmed:articleTitle
An analysis of the ACOG and AAP ethics statements on conflicts in maternal-fetal care.
pubmed:affiliation
Harding University Graduate School of Religion, Memphis.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article