Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
7
pubmed:dateCreated
2009-4-2
pubmed:abstractText
Neurotensin(8-13) and two related analogues were used as model systems to directly compare various N-terminal peptide modifications representing both commonly used and novel capping groups. Each N-terminal modification prevented aminopeptidase cleavage but surprisingly differed in its ability to inhibit cleavage at other sites, a phenomenon attributed to long-range conformational effects. None of the capping groups were inherently detrimental to human neurotensin receptor 1 (hNTR1) binding affinity or receptor agonism. Although the most stable peptides exhibited the lowest binding affinities and were the least potent receptor agonists, they produced the largest in vivo effects. Of the parameters studied only stability significantly correlated with in vivo efficacy, demonstrating that a reduction in binding affinity at NTR1 can be countered by increased in vivo stability.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
1520-4804
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:day
9
pubmed:volume
52
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1803-13
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2009
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparison of N-terminal modifications on neurotensin(8-13) analogues correlates peptide stability but not binding affinity with in vivo efficacy.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, In Vitro, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural