Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:19282342rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0024117lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19282342lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0085143lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19282342lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0206012lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19282342lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2347947lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19282342lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0549193lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19282342lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1511572lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:dateCreated2009-10-2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:abstractTextWe studied the distribution profiles and repeatability of key exercise performance parameters in the first large multicentre trials to include these measurements in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). After a screening visit, 463 subjects with COPD (mean+/-SD forced expiratory volume in 1 s 43+/-13% predicted) completed two run-in visits before treatment randomisation. At the run-in visits, measurements were conducted at rest, at a standardised time near end-exercise (isotime) and at peak exercise during constant work rate (CWR) cycle tests at 75% of each individual's maximum work capacity. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the test-retest repeatability of measurements of endurance time (ET), inspiratory capacity (IC), ventilation and dyspnoea intensity (Borg scale) during exercise. IC, ventilation and dyspnoea ratings were normally distributed; ET showed rightward skew (median<mean, skewness of 10.9 (much greater than zero)) with 16% of the sample exceeding 1 SD of the mean. ET was highly repeatable across run-in visits: 7.9+/-4.8 and 8.4+/-5.1 min (R = 0.84). IC values at rest, isotime and peak exercise were all highly repeatable (R > or = 0.87). Ventilation was repeatable over the same time-points (R > or = 0.92), as was dyspnoea intensity at isotime (R = 0.79) and at peak exercise (R = 0.81). In conclusion, key perceptual and ventilatory parameters can be reliably measured during CWR cycle exercise in multicentre clinical trials in moderate to very severe COPD.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:issn1399-3003lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MagnussenHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HamiltonAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WebbK AKAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TraversJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KestenSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HUJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:authorpubmed-author:O'DonnellD...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MaltaisFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LamY-MYMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:volume34lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:pagination866-74lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19282342...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19282342...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19282342...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19282342...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19282342...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19282342...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19282342...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19282342...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19282342...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19282342...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19282342...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19282342...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19282342...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19282342...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19282342...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19282342...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:year2009lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:articleTitleReliability of ventilatory parameters during cycle ergometry in multicentre trials in COPD.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:affiliationDept of Medicine, Queen's University and Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada. odonnell@queensu.calld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:publicationTypeMulticenter Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19282342pubmed:publicationTypeValidation Studieslld:pubmed