Linked Life Data

19269409

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/19269409

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
2009-3-9
pubmed:abstractText
The rise of monolithic stationary phases offers to routine and research laboratories several advantages. In spite of their recent discovery, they have rapidly become highly popular separation media for liquid chromatography. Time reduction and economic reasons like e.g. a diminished use of mobile phase are the most important ones. At the same time, it was reported that these columns offer a faster and better separation. The aim of this article was to investigate the transferability of methods originally developed on conventional particle-packed C(18) columns (XTerra RP18 and Zorbax RX), onto the more recent monolithic columns. Both types, conventional particle-packed and monolithic columns, were able to separate tetracycline, oxytetracycline and chlortetracycline from their respective impurities with sufficient resolution, but showed remarkably shorter analysis times and lower backpressures, improving the lifetime of the column.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
May
pubmed:issn
1873-3573
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:day
15
pubmed:volume
78
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
665-71
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2009
pubmed:articleTitle
Silica-based monolithic columns versus conventional particle-packed columns for liquid chromatographic analysis of tetracycline, oxytetracycline and chlortetracycline.
pubmed:affiliation
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Laboratorium voor Farmaceutische Analyse, O&N 2, PB 923, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Evaluation Studies