Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
2009-3-27
pubmed:abstractText
As the role and importance of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) increase, the validity and reliability of PRO measures come under greater scientific and regulatory scrutiny. One key issue is selecting the 'most appropriate' recall period for capturing PROs in clinical trials. This paper draws on survey research, health-specific literature, and results from clinical trials to summarize factors that can influence recall and provide guidance on selecting an optimal recall period.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
1473-4877
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
25
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
929-42
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2009
pubmed:articleTitle
Optimal recall periods for patient-reported outcomes: challenges and potential solutions.
pubmed:affiliation
Center for Health Outcomes Research, United BioSource Corporation, 20 Bloomsbury Square, London, UK. Donald.Stull@unitedbiosource.com
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't