Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:19239569rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025362lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19239569lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0008059lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19239569lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021822lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19239569lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332307lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19239569lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0087178lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19239569lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205341lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19239569lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1522634lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:dateCreated2009-4-23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:abstractTextThe present study examined the effects of repeating questions in interviews investigating the possible sexual abuse of children and youths who had a variety of intellectual disabilities. We predicted that the repetition of option-posing and suggestive questions would lead the suspected victims to change their responses, making it difficult to understand what actually happened. Inconsistency can be a key factor when assessing the reliability of witnesses.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:monthMaylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:issn1365-2788lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DanielssonHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LambM EMElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CederborgA-CA...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:authorpubmed-author:La RooyDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:volume53lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:pagination440-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:dateRevised2011-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19239569...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19239569...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19239569...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19239569...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19239569...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19239569...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19239569...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19239569...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19239569...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:year2009lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:articleTitleRepetition of contaminating question types when children and youths with intellectual disabilities are interviewed.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Behavioural Sciences/Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. ann-christin.cederborg@liu.selld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19239569pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed