pubmed-article:19239569 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0025362 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:19239569 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0008059 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:19239569 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0021822 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:19239569 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0332307 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:19239569 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0087178 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:19239569 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0205341 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:19239569 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1522634 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:issue | 5 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2009-4-23 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:abstractText | The present study examined the effects of repeating questions in interviews investigating the possible sexual abuse of children and youths who had a variety of intellectual disabilities. We predicted that the repetition of option-posing and suggestive questions would lead the suspected victims to change their responses, making it difficult to understand what actually happened. Inconsistency can be a key factor when assessing the reliability of witnesses. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:month | May | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:issn | 1365-2788 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:DanielssonHH | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:LambM EME | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:CederborgA-CA... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:La RooyDD | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:issnType | Electronic | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:volume | 53 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:pagination | 440-9 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2011-11-17 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19239569... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19239569... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19239569... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19239569... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19239569... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19239569... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19239569... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19239569... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19239569... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:year | 2009 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:articleTitle | Repetition of contaminating question types when children and youths with intellectual disabilities are interviewed. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Behavioural Sciences/Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. ann-christin.cederborg@liu.se | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19239569 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | lld:pubmed |