Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
2010-5-7
pubmed:abstractText
As the outcomes of heart, liver, and lung transplantation continue to improve, more patients will present for subsequent renal transplantation. It remains unclear whether these patients benefit from induction immunosuppression. We retrospectively reviewed induction on solid organ graft recipients who underwent renal transplant at our center from January 1, 1995 to March 30, 2007. Induction and the non-induction groups were compared by univariate and Kaplan-Meier analyses. There were 21 patients in each group, with mean follow-up of 4.5-6.0 years. Forty-seven percent of patients receiving induction had a severe post-operative infection, compared with 28.6% in the non-induction group (p = NS). The one yr rejection rate in the induction group was 9.5% compared with 14.3% for non-induction (p = NS). One-yr graft survival was 81.0% and 95.2% in the induction and non-induction group (p = NS). In summary, there is a trend toward lower patient and graft survival among patients undergoing induction. These trends could relate to selection bias in the decision to prescribe induction immunosuppression, but further study is needed to better define the risks and benefits of antibody-induction regimens in this population.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
1399-0012
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
24
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
67-72
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
Should heart, lung, and liver transplant recipients receive immunosuppression induction for kidney transplantation?
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't