pubmed-article:19216272 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0205148 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:19216272 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1707455 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:19216272 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0392747 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:19216272 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0011373 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:19216272 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1554963 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:issue | 6 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2009-2-16 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:abstractText | A satisfactory clinical outcome in dental implant treatment relies on primary stability for immediate load bearing. While the geometric design of an implant contributes to mechanical stability, the nature of the implant surface itself is also critically important. Biomechanical and microcomputerized tomographic evaluation of implant osseointegration was performed to compare alternative structural, chemical and biochemical, and/or pharmaceutical surface treatments applied to an identical established implant design. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:citationSubset | D | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:issn | 0882-2786 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:FergusonSteph... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ScharnweberDi... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:Schnabelrauch... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:van LentheG... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:von... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:BierbaumSusan... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:MuellerThomas... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:FrauchigerVin... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:LanghoffJens... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:VoelterKatrin... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:KautzArmin... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:SchlottigFalk... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:volume | 23 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:pagination | 1037-46 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19216272... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:articleTitle | Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:affiliation | Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland. stephen.ferguson@artorg.unibe.ch | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19216272 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | lld:pubmed |