Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
2009-2-16
pubmed:abstractText
A satisfactory clinical outcome in dental implant treatment relies on primary stability for immediate load bearing. While the geometric design of an implant contributes to mechanical stability, the nature of the implant surface itself is also critically important. Biomechanical and microcomputerized tomographic evaluation of implant osseointegration was performed to compare alternative structural, chemical and biochemical, and/or pharmaceutical surface treatments applied to an identical established implant design.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
D
pubmed:chemical
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Bone Density Conservation Agents, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Calcium Phosphates, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Chondroitin Sulfates, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Coated Materials, Biocompatible, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Collagen, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Dental Implants, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Dental Materials, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Diphosphonates, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Titanium, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Zirconium, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/calcium phosphate, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/zirconium oxide
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0882-2786
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
23
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1037-46
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Acid Etching, Dental, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Animals, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Biomechanics, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Bone Density, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Bone Density Conservation Agents, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Calcium Phosphates, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Chondroitin Sulfates, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Coated Materials, Biocompatible, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Collagen, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Dental Etching, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Dental Implants, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Dental Materials, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Dental Prosthesis Design, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Dental Prosthesis Retention, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Diphosphonates, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Electrochemical Techniques, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Ilium, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Materials Testing, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Osseointegration, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Osteogenesis, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Random Allocation, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Sheep, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Stress, Mechanical, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Surface Properties, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Time Factors, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Titanium, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Torque, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-X-Ray Microtomography, pubmed-meshheading:19216272-Zirconium
pubmed:articleTitle
Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants.
pubmed:affiliation
Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland. stephen.ferguson@artorg.unibe.ch
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't