Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/19172661
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2009-3-3
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The purpose of this study was to determine renal arterial anatomy and gender differences in adults without renovascular disease using multidetector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA). MDCTA datasets of 399 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Measurements of the aortorenal diameters, the angulation of the renal ostia and pedicles as well as the distance between the origins of the renal arteries were measured. Differences in measurements between genders were tested for statistical significance using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Pearson's Chi-Square tests. A total of 798 renal arteries were available for analysis in 207 female (mean age = 52.91 years) and 192 male patients (mean age = 53.04 years). Female patients were found to have smaller aortae (at the level of the right renal ostium) and bilateral renal arteries than males (mean aortic diameter M/F = 18.33/15.89 mm, mean right renal artery ostial diameter M/F = 5.06/4.59 mm, mean left ostial renal diameter M/F = 5.14/4.66 mm) (p < .001). There was no statistical significance for the renal ostia level in relation to the vertebrae and the majority of renal arteries originated at the L1 and L2 levels. The longitudinal distance between right and left renal artery ostia ranged from 0 to 32 mm (mean = 4,6 mm, median = 5mm). The mean anteroposterior orientation of the right renal ostia was M/F = 29.45 degrees/28.20 degrees , and M/F = -7.96 degrees/-11.14 degrees for left renal artery ostia. The mean anteroposterior orientation of the right renal pedicle was M/F = 41.37 degrees/44.34 degrees and M/F = 42.31 degrees/43.95 degrees for the left pedicle. There are some differences in normal renal arterial anatomy between genders. Normal renal arterial information is useful not only for planning and performing of endovascular and laparoscopic urologic procedures, but also for medical device development.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Mar
|
pubmed:issn |
1098-2353
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:copyrightInfo |
Copyright 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
|
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
22
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
236-42
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:19172661-Adolescent,
pubmed-meshheading:19172661-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:19172661-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:19172661-Aged, 80 and over,
pubmed-meshheading:19172661-Angiography,
pubmed-meshheading:19172661-Aorta, Abdominal,
pubmed-meshheading:19172661-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:19172661-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:19172661-Image Processing, Computer-Assisted,
pubmed-meshheading:19172661-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:19172661-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:19172661-Renal Artery,
pubmed-meshheading:19172661-Retrospective Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:19172661-Sex Factors,
pubmed-meshheading:19172661-Tomography, X-Ray Computed,
pubmed-meshheading:19172661-Young Adult
|
pubmed:year |
2009
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Normal renal arterial anatomy assessed by multidetector CT angiography: are there differences between men and women?
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Health System Foundation, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA. uct5d@virginia.edu
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|