Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:19107805rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0596995lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19107805lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0029418lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19107805lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0004927lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19107805lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0115137lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19107805lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:dateCreated2009-6-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:abstractTextSurface topography is one of the most important surface properties of biomaterials and microfabrication techniques provide new routes to produce precisely controlled surface topographies for investigating the topographic effects on cell behavior. In this study, hydroxyapatite (HA) microgrooved surfaces were used to study the osteoblast and myoblast response to the surface micro-features. The microgrooves were first produced on silicon wafers by photolithography, and then coated with HA using sputtering technique. Orientation angle (OA) was used to evaluate the contact guidance introduced by microgrooves and form index (FI) was introduced to describe the cell morphology change. The results show that the microgroove effects on myoblasts are more obvious than those on osteoblasts, and the two types of cells are sensitive to different sizes of microgrooves. The microgrooves with 8 microm width strongly affect both osteoblasts and myoblasts, while the microgrooves with 24 microm width strongly affect myoblasts only. These results confirm that the surface topographic effect is of cell specific, and therefore, design of surface topographic features must be different for myoblasts and osteoblasts.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:issn1552-4981lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LuXiongXlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LengYangYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:copyrightInfo(c) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:volume90lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:pagination438-45lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19107805...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19107805...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19107805...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19107805...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:year2009lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:articleTitleComparison of the osteoblast and myoblast behavior on hydroxyapatite microgrooves.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:affiliationKey Lab of Advanced Technologies of Materials, Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China. luxiong_2004@163.comlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19107805pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed