Linked Life Data

1910384

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/1910384

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
8
pubmed:dateCreated
1991-11-21
pubmed:abstractText
The advantages and problems of different types of artificial feeding are discussed. For patients needing long-term nutritional support, we see the following special advantages of PEG: physiological enteral nutrition with an only small risk of tube dislocation, no additional handicap of the natural swallowing procedure and without stigmatizing the patient by an external visible tube (Tab. 3). To help to spread this method of artificial feeding for the benefit of the patient, this article gives some informations on how to cope with the problems that might occur when using PEG (for example: a diet plan for building up the tube food nutrition (Tab. 4).
pubmed:language
ger
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Aug
pubmed:issn
0935-8943
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
70
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
445-8
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1991
pubmed:articleTitle
[High-caloric nutrition in radiochemotherapy, nasogastric tube and parenteral nutrition versus PEG (percutaneous endoscopic controlled gastrostomy)].
pubmed:affiliation
HNO-Universitäts-Klinik Hamburg, Abteilung für chirurgische Endoskopie des UKE.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, English Abstract