Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
12
pubmed:dateCreated
1991-9-19
pubmed:abstractText
This paper presents empirical data from the United Kingdom National Health Service on the comparative mean hospital costs per patient of first generation extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCN) in the treatment of kidney stones. These results were subjected to a sensitivity analysis and related to evidence on the health effects of the two approaches to treatment. The hospital costs of PCN were found to be lower than for ESWL in the empirical comparison and in most but not all the scenarios developed in the sensitivity analysis. The direction of the comparison was reversed when a high throughput was assumed for ESWL and a significantly higher per diem cost for PCN than ESWL. The relative cost-effectiveness of the two modes of treatment depended on whether successful treatment was defined in terms of rendering the patient free of stones (the traditional endpoint of treatment) or the rate at which patients returned to their normal activities.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0277-9536
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
32
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1401-12
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:1908134-Adolescent, pubmed-meshheading:1908134-Adult, pubmed-meshheading:1908134-Aged, pubmed-meshheading:1908134-Aged, 80 and over, pubmed-meshheading:1908134-Child, pubmed-meshheading:1908134-Child, Preschool, pubmed-meshheading:1908134-Cost-Benefit Analysis, pubmed-meshheading:1908134-Female, pubmed-meshheading:1908134-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:1908134-Kidney Calculi, pubmed-meshheading:1908134-Length of Stay, pubmed-meshheading:1908134-Lithotripsy, pubmed-meshheading:1908134-London, pubmed-meshheading:1908134-Male, pubmed-meshheading:1908134-Middle Aged, pubmed-meshheading:1908134-Nephrostomy, Percutaneous, pubmed-meshheading:1908134-Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care), pubmed-meshheading:1908134-Technology Assessment, Biomedical, pubmed-meshheading:1908134-Ureteral Calculi
pubmed:year
1991
pubmed:articleTitle
Relative costs and cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of renal and ureteric stones.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Public Health Medicine, United Medical School of Guy's Hospital, London, England.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't