Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/19023496
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
6
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2008-11-21
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Evaluate costs and benefits of erlotinib as 2nd or 3rd line treatment of advanced or metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) versus docetaxel, pemetrexed and best supportive care.
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
0873-2159
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
14
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
803-27
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:articleTitle |
An economic analysis of erlotinib, docetaxel, pemetrexed and best supportive care as second or third line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Francisco Gentil Portuguese Oncology Institute, Centro do Porto, Medical Oncology Unit, Porto, Portugal.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|