rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
umls-concept:C0010819,
umls-concept:C0302523,
umls-concept:C0302908,
umls-concept:C0333343,
umls-concept:C0334866,
umls-concept:C0439658,
umls-concept:C0439858,
umls-concept:C0557806,
umls-concept:C0700325,
umls-concept:C0868928,
umls-concept:C0884358,
umls-concept:C1521827,
umls-concept:C1704353,
umls-concept:C1707455,
umls-concept:C2728259
|
pubmed:issue |
11
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2008-11-3
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Newer liquid-based preparations differ morphologically from classic preparations (smears, filters, and cytocentrifuged preparations). Is adenocarcinoma more readily detected in liquid-based preparations? We reviewed responses from 16,750 fluid challenges of adenocarcinoma distributed in 2005 in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytology (CAP NGC).
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Nov
|
pubmed:issn |
1543-2165
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
132
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
1716-8
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
|
pubmed:year |
2008
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
A liquid concept--do classic preparations of body cavity fluid perform differently than ThinPrep cases? Observations from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytology.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
AmeriPath Indiana, Indianapolis, IN 46219-1739, USA. amoriarty@ameripath.com
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|