Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/18956247
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions |
umls-concept:C0006303,
umls-concept:C0007452,
umls-concept:C0011900,
umls-concept:C0016316,
umls-concept:C0021311,
umls-concept:C0022885,
umls-concept:C0035857,
umls-concept:C0039593,
umls-concept:C0043445,
umls-concept:C0205146,
umls-concept:C0243130,
umls-concept:C1280519,
umls-concept:C1510438,
umls-concept:C1514721,
umls-concept:C1880497,
umls-concept:C1996904
|
pubmed:issue |
5
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2009-5-8
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The effectiveness of Rose Bengal test (RBT) and fluorescence polarization assay (FPA) in diagnosing cattle brucellosis in endemic areas was assessed and RBT and FPA test agreement was compared (n = 319). The sensitivity of RBT and FPA in detecting low Brucella titres were evaluated in paired sera (n = 34). A logistic regression model was constructed to predict cattle test result in FPA using RBT as the main predictor and incorporating bio-data and animal history. There was 79.3% agreement between the RBT and FPA (Kappa = 0.59; Std error = 0.05; p = 0.000) and a high correspondence between high RBT scores and positive FPA results suggesting that sera with high RBT score may not require confirmation with tests such as competitive-ELISA or CFT. High FPA cut-off points were more likely to miss animals with low antibody titres. The RBT had a reduced ability in detecting low antibody titres compared to the FPA. FPA test interpretation was improved if a priori information, such as sex and age was used. Under the challenging disease surveillance conditions prevailing in rural Africa, field-testing methods that are sensitive and specific; allow single animal contact, low technical skills in data interpretation are suitable.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jun
|
pubmed:issn |
0049-4747
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
41
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
723-9
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:18956247-Agglutination Tests,
pubmed-meshheading:18956247-Animals,
pubmed-meshheading:18956247-Antibodies, Bacterial,
pubmed-meshheading:18956247-Brucella,
pubmed-meshheading:18956247-Brucellosis,
pubmed-meshheading:18956247-Cattle,
pubmed-meshheading:18956247-Cattle Diseases,
pubmed-meshheading:18956247-Endemic Diseases,
pubmed-meshheading:18956247-Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay,
pubmed-meshheading:18956247-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:18956247-Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay,
pubmed-meshheading:18956247-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:18956247-ROC Curve,
pubmed-meshheading:18956247-Rose Bengal,
pubmed-meshheading:18956247-Rural Population,
pubmed-meshheading:18956247-Sensitivity and Specificity,
pubmed-meshheading:18956247-Zambia
|
pubmed:year |
2009
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Effectiveness of Rose Bengal test and fluorescence polarization assay in the diagnosis of Brucella spp. infections in free range cattle reared in endemic areas in Zambia.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Disease Control, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia. jbwalya@lycos.com
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|