Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
4
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1991-10-17
|
pubmed:abstractText |
As the number of successful liver transplants has increased, the demand for donors has outpaced the supply. Approximately 25% of patients die awaiting an appropriate donor. Current criteria for assessing potential donors need to be closely examined. Fifty-six potential donors were evaluated by our transplant team by utilizing standard liver function tests (LFT's)-SGOT, SGPT, bilirubin. Additionally, a lidocaine metabolism test was performed by giving a 1 mg/kg IV dose of lidocaine over 1 minute and measuring the accumulation of the major metabolite monoethylglycinxylidide (MEGX) at 15 minutes by fluorescent polarization immunoassay (Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL). Previous work has suggested that a MEGX less than 50 ng/mL is associated with initial non-function. Thirty-four donors were transplanted (group I) and all had initial function (all MEGX values were greater than 50). Twenty-two donors (39%) were judged unacceptable (group II) by our transplant team and by outside centers based upon one of the following criteria: II A) elevated LFT's--8, 11 B) donor age--5, II C) donor instability--4, II D) no available recipient--3, II E) miscellaneous--2. Standard LFT's were not statistically different in the donors used and in those not used when excluding category II A. Six of seven donors excluded in group I had acceptable MEGX values indicating they may have been transplantable. Ten of 12 patients excluded in groups II B-D had normal LFT's and nine of 12 had acceptable MEGX values indicating they may have been transplantable also. In this era of organ shortage, a reevaluation of donor selection criteria utilizing new tests like MEGX may be necessary to meet the increased need.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
0887-8013
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
5
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
275-7
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:1890541-Adolescent,
pubmed-meshheading:1890541-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:1890541-Child,
pubmed-meshheading:1890541-Child, Preschool,
pubmed-meshheading:1890541-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:1890541-Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay,
pubmed-meshheading:1890541-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:1890541-Infant,
pubmed-meshheading:1890541-Lidocaine,
pubmed-meshheading:1890541-Liver Function Tests,
pubmed-meshheading:1890541-Liver Transplantation,
pubmed-meshheading:1890541-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:1890541-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:1890541-Tissue Donors
|
pubmed:year |
1991
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Selection criteria for liver transplant donors.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Ohio 45267-0714.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|