Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/18828934
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
4
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2008-10-2
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The aim of this study was to examine location of systematic reviews of test accuracy in five specialist review databases: York CRD's DARE and HTA databases, Medion (University of Maastricht), C-EBLM (International Federation of Clinical Chemistry), and the ARIF in-house database (University of Birmingham).
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
0266-4623
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
24
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
403-11
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:18828934-Databases, Bibliographic,
pubmed-meshheading:18828934-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:18828934-Information Storage and Retrieval,
pubmed-meshheading:18828934-Predictive Value of Tests,
pubmed-meshheading:18828934-Review Literature as Topic,
pubmed-meshheading:18828934-Technology Assessment, Biomedical
|
pubmed:year |
2008
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Locating systematic reviews of test accuracy studies: how five specialist review databases measure up.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK. s.bayliss@bham.ac.uk
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|