Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/18765887
Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
19
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
2008-9-11
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
We have previously developed a dual-energy digital mammography (DEDM) technique for calcification imaging under full-field imaging conditions using a commercially available flat-panel based digital mammography system. Although dual-energy (DE) imaging could suppress the obscuration of calcifications by tissue-structure background, it also increases the intrinsic noise in the DE images. Here we report on the effects of three different noise reduction techniques on DE calcification images: a simple smoothing (boxcar) filter applied to the DE image, a median filter applied to the HE image prior to the computation of the DE image and an adaptation of the Kalender's correlated-noise reduction (KNR) technique for DEDM. We compared the different noise reduction techniques by evaluating their effects on DE calcification images of a 5 cm thick breast-tissue-equivalent slab with continuously varying glandular-tissue ratio superimposed with calcium carbonate crystals of various sizes that simulate calcifications. Evaluations of different noise reducing techniques were performed by comparison of the root-mean-square signal in background regions (no calcifications present) of the DE calcification images and the contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) of the calcifications in the DE calcification images. Amongst the different noise reduction techniques evaluated in this study, the KNR method was found to be most effective in reducing the image noise and increasing the calcification visibility (or CNR), closely followed by the HE median filter technique. Although the simple smoothing (boxcar) filter reduced the noise, it did not improve calcification visibility. The visible calcification threshold size with DEDM over smoothly varying background at screening mammography doses, assuming a CNR threshold of 4, was estimated to be around 250 microm with both the HE median filter and the KNR techniques. The quality of DE images with noise reduction techniques based on phantom studies were verified with DE images of an animal-tissue phantom that consisted of calcifications superimposed over more realistic tissue structures.
|
| pubmed:grant | |
| pubmed:commentsCorrections |
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18765887-10580946,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18765887-10757607,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18765887-12201421,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18765887-12607836,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18765887-12852535,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18765887-15272674,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18765887-15560006,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18765887-16372415,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18765887-16625044,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18765887-2294555,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18765887-2586373,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18765887-3185410,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18765887-3386585,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18765887-4010633,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18765887-4010634,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18765887-4430588,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18765887-6981974,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18765887-7033756,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18765887-7290019,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18765887-7824718,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18765887-8426870,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18765887-8439582,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18765887-934468,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18765887-967922
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:chemical | |
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Oct
|
| pubmed:issn |
0031-9155
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:day |
7
|
| pubmed:volume |
53
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
5421-43
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2011-9-26
|
| pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:18765887-Animals,
pubmed-meshheading:18765887-Calcinosis,
pubmed-meshheading:18765887-Calcium Carbonate,
pubmed-meshheading:18765887-Mammary Glands, Animal,
pubmed-meshheading:18765887-Mammography,
pubmed-meshheading:18765887-Phantoms, Imaging,
pubmed-meshheading:18765887-Radiographic Image Enhancement
|
| pubmed:year |
2008
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: noise reduction techniques.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Imaging Physics, Unit 1352, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. skappadath@mdanderson.org
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.,
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
|