rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
pubmed:issue |
8
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2008-11-10
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Skin notations are used as a hazard identification tool to flag chemicals associated with a potential risk related to transdermal penetration. The transparency and rigorousness of the skin notation assignment process have recently been questioned. We compared different approaches proposed as criteria for these notations as a starting point for improving and systematizing current practice.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical |
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Nov
|
pubmed:issn |
1475-3162
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
52
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
747-56
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:18687973-Air Pollutants, Occupational,
pubmed-meshheading:18687973-Databases, Factual,
pubmed-meshheading:18687973-Hazardous Substances,
pubmed-meshheading:18687973-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:18687973-Inhalation Exposure,
pubmed-meshheading:18687973-Lethal Dose 50,
pubmed-meshheading:18687973-Maximum Allowable Concentration,
pubmed-meshheading:18687973-Occupational Exposure,
pubmed-meshheading:18687973-Occupational Health,
pubmed-meshheading:18687973-Risk Assessment,
pubmed-meshheading:18687973-Skin Absorption
|
pubmed:year |
2008
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Comparison of indices proposed as criteria for assigning skin notation.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Institute for Work and Health, University of Lausanne, Bugnon 19, Lausanne 1005, Switzerland.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|