Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
10
pubmed:dateCreated
2008-10-28
pubmed:abstractText
Cervical artificial discs are frequently implanted. Clinical data are frequently presented. However, biomechanical data are scarce. The literature is extensively reviewed following general rules for systemic review. The manufacturers of cervical artificial discs are requested for information. Only 10 articles were suitable for review. Together with some information of the manufacturer, data of 5 out of 8 discs can be provided. Comparison is not possible since testing methods differ. Before introduction of a new device biomechanical data should be provided. This should be done after standardized testing and presentation of the results. Only then comparison is possible as is a responsible choice for our patients.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
0303-8467
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
110
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
963-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2011-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2008
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparison of biomechanical properties of cervical artificial disc prosthesis: a review.
pubmed:affiliation
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Department of Neurosurgery, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. r.bartels@nch.umcn.nl
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Review