Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1857632rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030193lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1857632lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1999177lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1857632lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2347947lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1857632lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0175659lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1857632lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0349674lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1857632lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1698057lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1857632lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1516322lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1857632lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707959lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1857632lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0222045lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:dateCreated1991-8-29lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:abstractTextThe use of closed scales (with anchors at each end) to measure pain was found to produce ceiling effects characterized by a deceleration of ratings toward the upper end of the scale. This was consistent with previous research. Apart from producing nonlinear functions, the closed scale also limited test-retest reliability because of subjects' tendencies to correct their distorted ratings in subsequent trials. However, an open-ended scale coupled with transformation of reported ratings into a decile scale virtually eliminated the ceiling effect, thus producing consistently linear functions and maximizing test-retest reliability. This finding may have implications for the measurement of other sensory and psychological phenomena, especially those in which the property evaluated varies in a continuous fashion.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:citationSubsetClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:monthJunlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:issn0031-5117lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FernandezEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ThornB EBElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NygrenT ETElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:volume49lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:pagination572-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1857632-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1857632-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1857632-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1857632-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1857632-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1857632-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:year1991lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:articleTitleAn "open-transformed scale" for correcting ceiling effects and enhancing retest reliability: the example of pain.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Psychology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1857632pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed