Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
6
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1991-8-29
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The use of closed scales (with anchors at each end) to measure pain was found to produce ceiling effects characterized by a deceleration of ratings toward the upper end of the scale. This was consistent with previous research. Apart from producing nonlinear functions, the closed scale also limited test-retest reliability because of subjects' tendencies to correct their distorted ratings in subsequent trials. However, an open-ended scale coupled with transformation of reported ratings into a decile scale virtually eliminated the ceiling effect, thus producing consistently linear functions and maximizing test-retest reliability. This finding may have implications for the measurement of other sensory and psychological phenomena, especially those in which the property evaluated varies in a continuous fashion.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
C
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jun
|
pubmed:issn |
0031-5117
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
49
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
572-8
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:year |
1991
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
An "open-transformed scale" for correcting ceiling effects and enhancing retest reliability: the example of pain.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Psychology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|