Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/18514452
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2008-6-18
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Since the introduction in 2001 of a urine-based detection method for recombinant erythropoietin (rHuEPO), transfusion-doping practices have regained interest. To address this problem, an efficient antidoping test designed to obtain direct proof of allogeneic blood transfusion was developed and validated. This test, based on flow cytometry analysis of red blood cell (RBCs) phenotypes, was used to determine the absence or the presence of numerous RBCs populations in a blood sample. A such, it may constitute a direct proof of an abnormal blood population resulting from homologous transfusion. Single-blind and single-site studies were carried out to validate this method as a forensic quality standard analysis and to allow objective interpretation of real cases. The analysis of 140 blood samples containing different percentages (0-5%) of a minor RBCs population were carried on by four independent analysts. Robustness, sensitivity, specificity, precision and stability were assessed. ISO-accredited controls samples were used to demonstrate that the method was robust, stable and precise. No false positive results were observed, resulting in a 100% specificity of the method. Most samples containing a 1.5% minor RBCs population were unambiguously detected, yielding a 78.1% sensitivity. These samples mimicked blood collected from an athlete 3 months after a homologous blood transfusion event where 10% of the total RBCs present in the recipient originated in the donor. The observed false negative results could be explained by differences in antigen expression between the donor and the recipient. False negatives were more numerous with smaller minor RBCs populations. The method described here fulfils the ISO-17025 accreditation and validation requirements. The controls and the methodology are solid enough to determine with certainty whether a sample contains one or more RBCs populations. This variable is currently the best indicator for homologous blood transfusion doping.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jul
|
pubmed:issn |
1872-6283
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:day |
18
|
pubmed:volume |
179
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
23-33
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:18514452-Blood Transfusion,
pubmed-meshheading:18514452-Case-Control Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:18514452-Doping in Sports,
pubmed-meshheading:18514452-Erythrocytes,
pubmed-meshheading:18514452-Flow Cytometry,
pubmed-meshheading:18514452-Fluorescence,
pubmed-meshheading:18514452-Forensic Medicine,
pubmed-meshheading:18514452-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:18514452-Phenotype,
pubmed-meshheading:18514452-Sensitivity and Specificity,
pubmed-meshheading:18514452-Single-Blind Method,
pubmed-meshheading:18514452-Staining and Labeling,
pubmed-meshheading:18514452-Transplantation, Homologous
|
pubmed:year |
2008
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Scientific and forensic standards for homologous blood transfusion anti-doping analyses.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Laboratoire Suisse d'Analyse du Dopage, Institut Universitaire de Médecine Légale, Chemin des Croisettes 22, CH-1066 Epalinges, Switzerland. Sylvain.Giraud@chuv.ch
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Validation Studies
|