Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/18491108
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions |
umls-concept:C0006142,
umls-concept:C0024671,
umls-concept:C0086296,
umls-concept:C0181904,
umls-concept:C0348026,
umls-concept:C0596972,
umls-concept:C0597198,
umls-concept:C0728873,
umls-concept:C1300749,
umls-concept:C1441526,
umls-concept:C1521743,
umls-concept:C1690006,
umls-concept:C1704608,
umls-concept:C1704646,
umls-concept:C1707455,
umls-concept:C1880157,
umls-concept:C1948062
|
pubmed:issue |
11
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2008-10-13
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The purpose was to compare observer performance in the detection of breast cancer using hard-copy film, and 3-megapixel (3-MP) and 5-megapixel (5-MP) liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors in a simulated screening setting. We amassed 100 sample sets, including 32 patients with surgically proven breast cancer (masses present, N = 12; microcalcifications, N = 10; other types, N = 10) and 68 normal controls. All the mammograms were obtained using computed radiography (CR; sampling pitch of 50 mum). Twelve mammographers independently assessed CR mammograms presented in random order for hard-copy and soft-copy reading at minimal 4-week intervals. Observers rated the images on seven-point (1 to 7) and continuous (0 to 100) malignancy scales. Receiver-operating-characteristics analysis was performed, and the average area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for each modality. The jackknife method with the Bonferroni correction was applied to multireader/multicase analysis. The average AUC values for the 3-MP LCD, 5-MP LCD, and hard-copy film were 0.954, 0.947, and 0.956 on the seven-point scale and 0.943, 0.923, and 0.944 on the continuous scale, respectively. There were no significant differences among the three modalities on either scale. Soft-copy reading using 3-MP and 5-MP LCDs is comparable to hard-copy reading for detecting breast cancer.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Nov
|
pubmed:issn |
1432-1084
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
18
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
2363-9
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:18491108-Breast Neoplasms,
pubmed-meshheading:18491108-Computer Terminals,
pubmed-meshheading:18491108-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:18491108-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:18491108-Mammography,
pubmed-meshheading:18491108-Observer Variation,
pubmed-meshheading:18491108-Radiographic Image Enhancement,
pubmed-meshheading:18491108-Reproducibility of Results,
pubmed-meshheading:18491108-Sensitivity and Specificity,
pubmed-meshheading:18491108-X-Ray Film
|
pubmed:year |
2008
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Diagnostic performance of detecting breast cancer on computed radiographic (CR) mammograms: comparison of hard copy film, 3-megapixel liquid-crystal-display (LCD) monitor and 5-megapixel LCD monitor.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University, Graduate School of Medicine, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan. yamataka@rad.med.tohoku.ac.jp
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't,
Evaluation Studies
|