| pubmed-article:1848996 | pubmed:abstractText | The outcome of two different alternating regimens of chemotherapy was investigated in a prospective controlled trial in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Both regimens comprised cyclophosphamide, lomustine, vincristine, methotrexate, doxorubicin and etoposide administered in different schedules. The investigative regimen (B) included simultaneous administration of cyclophosphamide + lomustine alternating with cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin, and with doxorubicin + lomustine. The hypothetical superiority of this regimen was based on data from experimental animal tumors suggesting potentiated efficacy of the three specific combinations. A total of 234 patients were included, and 113 vs 108 patients were eligible. Median survival in both groups was 48 weeks (p = 0.89). Complete remissions were observed in 36/101 and in 42/99 patients evaluable for response. There was no significant difference in response duration. At restaging after 18 months of chemotherapy 27 patients (16%) and 22 patients (16%), respectively, were free of disease. Six patients, three in each arm, are still alive, 8+ to 10.5+ years after diagnosis. Scheduled doses of the six agents were the same in the two regimens except for a 30% reduction of every second dose of cyclophosphamide in regimen B. Nevertheless, regimen B resulted in significantly more leukopenic patients, septicemic episodes, and blood transfusions, and the dosage of etoposide was more often reduced in arm B than in arm A. The increased toxicity was not associated with improved treatment results. | lld:pubmed |
