Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1991-5-3
pubmed:abstractText
The outcome of two different alternating regimens of chemotherapy was investigated in a prospective controlled trial in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Both regimens comprised cyclophosphamide, lomustine, vincristine, methotrexate, doxorubicin and etoposide administered in different schedules. The investigative regimen (B) included simultaneous administration of cyclophosphamide + lomustine alternating with cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin, and with doxorubicin + lomustine. The hypothetical superiority of this regimen was based on data from experimental animal tumors suggesting potentiated efficacy of the three specific combinations. A total of 234 patients were included, and 113 vs 108 patients were eligible. Median survival in both groups was 48 weeks (p = 0.89). Complete remissions were observed in 36/101 and in 42/99 patients evaluable for response. There was no significant difference in response duration. At restaging after 18 months of chemotherapy 27 patients (16%) and 22 patients (16%), respectively, were free of disease. Six patients, three in each arm, are still alive, 8+ to 10.5+ years after diagnosis. Scheduled doses of the six agents were the same in the two regimens except for a 30% reduction of every second dose of cyclophosphamide in regimen B. Nevertheless, regimen B resulted in significantly more leukopenic patients, septicemic episodes, and blood transfusions, and the dosage of etoposide was more often reduced in arm B than in arm A. The increased toxicity was not associated with improved treatment results.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
0923-7534
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
2
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
41-6
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:1848996-Adult, pubmed-meshheading:1848996-Aged, pubmed-meshheading:1848996-Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, pubmed-meshheading:1848996-Brain Neoplasms, pubmed-meshheading:1848996-Carcinoma, Small Cell, pubmed-meshheading:1848996-Cyclophosphamide, pubmed-meshheading:1848996-Doxorubicin, pubmed-meshheading:1848996-Drug Administration Schedule, pubmed-meshheading:1848996-Etoposide, pubmed-meshheading:1848996-Female, pubmed-meshheading:1848996-Hematologic Diseases, pubmed-meshheading:1848996-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:1848996-Lomustine, pubmed-meshheading:1848996-Lung Neoplasms, pubmed-meshheading:1848996-Male, pubmed-meshheading:1848996-Methotrexate, pubmed-meshheading:1848996-Middle Aged, pubmed-meshheading:1848996-Neoplasm Staging, pubmed-meshheading:1848996-Prospective Studies, pubmed-meshheading:1848996-Recurrence, pubmed-meshheading:1848996-Remission Induction, pubmed-meshheading:1848996-Survival Rate, pubmed-meshheading:1848996-Vincristine
pubmed:year
1991
pubmed:articleTitle
Combination chemotherapy of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. A controlled trial on 221 patients comparing two alternating regimens.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Oncology, Finsen Institute/Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't