Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:18489486rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0024947lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18489486lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021156lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18489486lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0399526lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18489486lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439851lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18489486lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1552596lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18489486lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1947931lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:dateCreated2008-5-20lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:abstractTextThe purpose of this study was to clarify the influence anterior occlusion, of mouthguards, has on protecting against a direct collision to the maxillary anterior teeth. In other words, the support mandibular dentition has when wearing a mouthguard. Two types of mouthguards were used for this study, one with an appropriate anterior occlusion or a mouthguard with positive anterior occlusion (MGAO+) and another which was a single-layer mouthguard lacking the same occlusion or a mouthguard with negative anterior occlusion (MGAO-) but with the same thickness on the buccal side. The instruments used for testing were a pendulum-type impact device with two interchangeable impact objects (a steel ball and a baseball), with a plastic jaw model having artificial teeth. Four testing conditions were observed: one with the jaw open without a mouthguard (Open NoMG), the second with the jaw clenching (loaded with 30 kg weight) without a mouthguard (Clench. NoMG), the third with the jaw clenching with MGAO- (Clench. MGAO-) and the last with the jaw clenching with MGAO+ (Clench. MGAO+). The results are as follows: both types of mouthguards showed the effects in reducing the distortion of the teeth. However, the effect was significantly obvious (steel ball = about 57% shock absorption ability, baseball = about 26%) in the mouthguard with anterior occlusion or support by lower dentition through mouthguard (Clench. MGAO+) than Clench. MGAO-. Thus, the influence of anterior occlusion of mouthguards or the support of mandibular dentition through wearing a mouthguard (MGAO+) is indispensable in reducing the impact force and tooth distortion. The results of this research should further contribute to the establishment of guidelines for safer mouthguards.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:citationSubsetDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:monthJunlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:issn1600-9657lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:authorpubmed-author:IshigamiKeiic...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TakedaTomotak...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NakajimaKazun...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RegnerConnell...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JunHandaHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KurokawaKatsu...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NaitohKaoruKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ShomuraMasahi...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:volume24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:pagination360-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18489486...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18489486...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18489486...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18489486...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18489486...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18489486...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18489486...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18489486...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18489486...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18489486...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18489486...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18489486...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:year2008lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:articleTitleAre all mouthguards the same and safe to use? Part 2. The influence of anterior occlusion against a direct impact on maxillary incisors.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Sports Dentistry, Tokyo Dental College, Chiba, Japan. takedat@attglobal.netlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18489486pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed