Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/18489486
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
3
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2008-5-20
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The purpose of this study was to clarify the influence anterior occlusion, of mouthguards, has on protecting against a direct collision to the maxillary anterior teeth. In other words, the support mandibular dentition has when wearing a mouthguard. Two types of mouthguards were used for this study, one with an appropriate anterior occlusion or a mouthguard with positive anterior occlusion (MGAO+) and another which was a single-layer mouthguard lacking the same occlusion or a mouthguard with negative anterior occlusion (MGAO-) but with the same thickness on the buccal side. The instruments used for testing were a pendulum-type impact device with two interchangeable impact objects (a steel ball and a baseball), with a plastic jaw model having artificial teeth. Four testing conditions were observed: one with the jaw open without a mouthguard (Open NoMG), the second with the jaw clenching (loaded with 30 kg weight) without a mouthguard (Clench. NoMG), the third with the jaw clenching with MGAO- (Clench. MGAO-) and the last with the jaw clenching with MGAO+ (Clench. MGAO+). The results are as follows: both types of mouthguards showed the effects in reducing the distortion of the teeth. However, the effect was significantly obvious (steel ball = about 57% shock absorption ability, baseball = about 26%) in the mouthguard with anterior occlusion or support by lower dentition through mouthguard (Clench. MGAO+) than Clench. MGAO-. Thus, the influence of anterior occlusion of mouthguards or the support of mandibular dentition through wearing a mouthguard (MGAO+) is indispensable in reducing the impact force and tooth distortion. The results of this research should further contribute to the establishment of guidelines for safer mouthguards.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
D
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jun
|
pubmed:issn |
1600-9657
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
24
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
360-5
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:18489486-Athletic Injuries,
pubmed-meshheading:18489486-Baseball,
pubmed-meshheading:18489486-Dental Models,
pubmed-meshheading:18489486-Dental Occlusion, Balanced,
pubmed-meshheading:18489486-Dental Stress Analysis,
pubmed-meshheading:18489486-Equipment Design,
pubmed-meshheading:18489486-Equipment Safety,
pubmed-meshheading:18489486-Incisor,
pubmed-meshheading:18489486-Maxilla,
pubmed-meshheading:18489486-Mouth Protectors,
pubmed-meshheading:18489486-Sports Equipment,
pubmed-meshheading:18489486-Tooth Injuries
|
pubmed:year |
2008
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Are all mouthguards the same and safe to use? Part 2. The influence of anterior occlusion against a direct impact on maxillary incisors.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Sports Dentistry, Tokyo Dental College, Chiba, Japan. takedat@attglobal.net
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|