Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:18468388rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0006836lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18468388lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0003308lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18468388lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025664lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18468388lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0002679lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18468388lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0016277lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18468388lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0370215lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18468388lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707520lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18468388lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1697858lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18468388lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205210lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:dateCreated2008-5-12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:abstractTextThis study analyzed the correlation between the results obtained through two microdilution methods: Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) (M27-A2) and European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) (document E. Dis. 7.1) and an agar base method Etest for determining minimmun inhibitory concentration (MIC) for amphotericin B and fluconazole against 30 clinical isolates of Candida spp. The agreement between Etest, CLSI and EUCAST MICs within +/- 2 log2 dilutions was higher for amphotericin B than for fluconazole However, Pearson correlation demonstrated a greater agreement for fluconazole. The categorical agreement between MICs provided by the Etest/ CLSI and Etest/EUCAST methodologies was high for both amphotericin B (100%) and fluconazole (> or = 96.66%). This study demonstrated the adequacy of Etest method using Mueller Hinton agar to evaluate amphotericin B and fluconazole susceptibility of clinical isolates of Candida spp.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:monthAprlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:issn0031-7144lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LyonJ PJPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FrancoM CMClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChavascoJ KJKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SzeszsM WMWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MelhemM S CMSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ClaudinoA L...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PeixotoR...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:volume63lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:pagination286-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:dateRevised2009-11-19lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18468388...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18468388...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18468388...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18468388...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18468388...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18468388...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18468388...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18468388...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18468388...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:year2008lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:articleTitleCorrelation between CLSI, EUCAST and Etest methodologies for amphotericin B and fluconazole antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida spp. clinical isolates.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:affiliationDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Alfena (UNIFAL-MG), Alfenas-MG, Brazil.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18468388pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed