Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
2008-5-12
pubmed:abstractText
This study analyzed the correlation between the results obtained through two microdilution methods: Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) (M27-A2) and European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) (document E. Dis. 7.1) and an agar base method Etest for determining minimmun inhibitory concentration (MIC) for amphotericin B and fluconazole against 30 clinical isolates of Candida spp. The agreement between Etest, CLSI and EUCAST MICs within +/- 2 log2 dilutions was higher for amphotericin B than for fluconazole However, Pearson correlation demonstrated a greater agreement for fluconazole. The categorical agreement between MICs provided by the Etest/ CLSI and Etest/EUCAST methodologies was high for both amphotericin B (100%) and fluconazole (> or = 96.66%). This study demonstrated the adequacy of Etest method using Mueller Hinton agar to evaluate amphotericin B and fluconazole susceptibility of clinical isolates of Candida spp.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
0031-7144
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
63
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
286-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-19
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2008
pubmed:articleTitle
Correlation between CLSI, EUCAST and Etest methodologies for amphotericin B and fluconazole antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida spp. clinical isolates.
pubmed:affiliation
Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Alfena (UNIFAL-MG), Alfenas-MG, Brazil.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't