18448723

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/18448723

Download in:

Switch to

Custom View

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0035168, umls-concept:C0679823, umls-concept:C0680264
pubmed:issue	5
pubmed:dateCreated	2008-5-1
pubmed:abstractText	Payment for research participation has raised ethical concerns, especially with respect to its potential for coercion. We argue that characterising payment for research participation as coercive is misguided, because offers of benefit cannot constitute coercion. In this article we analyse the concept of coercion, refute mistaken conceptions of coercion and explain why the offer of payment for research participation is never coercive but in some cases may produce undue inducement.
pubmed:language	eng
pubmed:journal	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/journal/7513619
pubmed:citationSubset	E
pubmed:status	MEDLINE
pubmed:month	May
pubmed:issn	1473-4257
pubmed:author	pubmed-author:MillerF GFG, pubmed-author:WertheimerAA
pubmed:issnType	Electronic
pubmed:volume	34
pubmed:owner	NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete	Y
pubmed:pagination	389-92
pubmed:meshHeading	pubmed-meshheading:18448723-Adult, pubmed-meshheading:18448723-Clinical Trials as Topic, pubmed-meshheading:18448723-Coercion, pubmed-meshheading:18448723-Ethics, Research, pubmed-meshheading:18448723-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:18448723-Informed Consent
pubmed:year	2008
pubmed:articleTitle	Payment for research participation: a coercive offer?
pubmed:affiliation	Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1156, USA.
pubmed:publicationType	Journal Article