Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/18428428
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
6
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2008-8-14
|
pubmed:abstractText |
We consider the analysis of multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within a gene or region. The simplest analysis of such data is based on a series of single SNP hypothesis tests, followed by correction for multiple testing, but it is intuitively plausible that a joint analysis of the SNPs will have higher power, particularly when the causal locus may not have been observed. However, standard tests, such as a likelihood ratio test based on an unrestricted alternative hypothesis, tend to have large numbers of degrees of freedom and hence low power. This has motivated a number of alternative test statistics. Here we compare several of the competing methods, including the multivariate score test (Hotelling's test) of Chapman et al. ([2003] Hum. Hered. 56:18-31), Fisher's method for combining P-values, the minimum P-value approach, a Fourier-transform-based approach recently suggested by Wang and Elston ([2007] Am. J. Human Genet. 80:353-360) and a Bayesian score statistic proposed for microarray data by Goeman et al. ([2005] J. R. Stat. Soc. B 68:477-493). Some relationships between these methods are pointed out, and simulation results given to show that the minimum P-value and the Goeman et al. ([2005] J. R. Stat. Soc. B 68:477-493) approaches work well over a range of scenarios. The Wang and Elston approach often performs poorly; we explain why, and show how its performance can be substantially improved.
|
pubmed:grant | |
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18428428-11836651,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18428428-11923914,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18428428-12647259,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18428428-14614235,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18428428-14641242,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18428428-17554300
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Sep
|
pubmed:issn |
1098-2272
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:copyrightInfo |
(c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
|
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
32
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
560-6
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2009-11-18
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:18428428-Alleles,
pubmed-meshheading:18428428-Bayes Theorem,
pubmed-meshheading:18428428-Computer Simulation,
pubmed-meshheading:18428428-Fourier Analysis,
pubmed-meshheading:18428428-Gene Frequency,
pubmed-meshheading:18428428-Genotype,
pubmed-meshheading:18428428-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:18428428-Linear Models,
pubmed-meshheading:18428428-Models, Genetic,
pubmed-meshheading:18428428-Models, Statistical,
pubmed-meshheading:18428428-Multivariate Analysis,
pubmed-meshheading:18428428-Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
|
pubmed:year |
2008
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Analysis of multiple SNPs in a candidate gene or region.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. juliet.chapman@lshtm.ac.uk
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|