GENERIC 18424534

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0009462, umls-concept:C0205145, umls-concept:C0521009, umls-concept:C1880022
pubmed:issue	12
pubmed:dateCreated	2008-6-16
pubmed:databankReference	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612352, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612353, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612354, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612355, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612356, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612357, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612358, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612359, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612360, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612361, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612362, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612363, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612364, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612365, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612366, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612367, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612368, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612369, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612370, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612371, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612372, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612373, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612374, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612375, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612376, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612377, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612378, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612379, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612380, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612381, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612382, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612383, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612384, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612385, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612386, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612387, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612388, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612389, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612390, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612391, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612392, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612393, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612394, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612395, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612396, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612397, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612398, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612399, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612400, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612401, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612402, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612403, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612404, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612405, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612406, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612407, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612408, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612409, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612410, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612411, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612412, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612413, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612414, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612415, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612416, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612417, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612418, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612419, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612420, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612421, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612422, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612423, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612424, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612425, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612426, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612427, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612428, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612429, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612430, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612431, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612432, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EF612433, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/xref/GENBANK/EU014795
pubmed:abstractText	Bacterial diversity in mine tailing microbial communities has not been thoroughly investigated despite the correlations that have been observed between the relative microbial diversity and the success of revegetation efforts at tailing sites. This study employed phylogenetic analyses of 16S rRNA genes to compare the bacterial communities present in highly disturbed, extremely (pH 2.7) and moderately (pH 5.7) acidic lead-zinc mine tailing samples from a semiarid environment with those from a vegetated off-site (OS) control sample (pH 8). Phylotype richness in these communities decreased from 42 in the OS control to 24 in the moderately acidic samples and 8 in the extremely acidic tailing samples. The clones in the extremely acidic tailing sample were most closely related to acidophiles, none of which were detected in the OS control sample. The comparison generated by this study between the bacteria present in extremely acidic tailing and that in moderately acidic tailing communities with those in an OS control soil provides a reference point from which to evaluate the successful restoration of mine tailing disposal sites by phytostabilization.
pubmed:grant	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/grant/2 P42 ES04940-11
pubmed:commentsCorrections	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18424534-19719632, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18424534-10966399, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18424534-17586664, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18424534-17636285, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18424534-17564609, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18424534-17059483, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18424534-17215233, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/18424534-17222129

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.

Predicate

Object

rdf:type

pubmed:Citation

lifeskim:mentions

umls-concept:C0009462, umls-concept:C0205145, umls-concept:C0521009, umls-concept:C1880022

pubmed:issue

pubmed:dateCreated

2008-6-16

pubmed:databankReference

pubmed:abstractText

Bacterial diversity in mine tailing microbial communities has not been thoroughly investigated despite the correlations that have been observed between the relative microbial diversity and the success of revegetation efforts at tailing sites. This study employed phylogenetic analyses of 16S rRNA genes to compare the bacterial communities present in highly disturbed, extremely (pH 2.7) and moderately (pH 5.7) acidic lead-zinc mine tailing samples from a semiarid environment with those from a vegetated off-site (OS) control sample (pH 8). Phylotype richness in these communities decreased from 42 in the OS control to 24 in the moderately acidic samples and 8 in the extremely acidic tailing samples. The clones in the extremely acidic tailing sample were most closely related to acidophiles, none of which were detected in the OS control sample. The comparison generated by this study between the bacteria present in extremely acidic tailing and that in moderately acidic tailing communities with those in an OS control soil provides a reference point from which to evaluate the successful restoration of mine tailing disposal sites by phytostabilization.

pubmed:grant

http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/grant/2 P42 ES04940-11

pubmed:commentsCorrections