Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
10
pubmed:dateCreated
1991-11-4
pubmed:abstractText
Technetium-99m-sestamibi, a new myocardial perfusion imaging agent, does not show significant or rapid myocardial redistribution following its intravenous injection at stress. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the myocardial clearance of 99mTc-sestamibi and ischemic/normal wall ratios at 1 hr and at 3 hr after injection at stress in patients with significant coronary artery disease. Twenty-five patients with ischemic defects on 201Tl scans (n = 15) and/or significant disease on coronary angiogram (n = 18) were prospectively studied. Planar images were obtained at 65 and at 190 min after an injection at stress of 20-25 mCi of 99mTc-sestamibi. A rest study was performed 1-6 days later. Ischemic/normal wall ratios were 0.73 +/- 0.10 and 0.83 +/- 0.12 (p less than 0.05) at 1 and 3 hr, respectively (0.98 +/- 0.15 at rest). Myocardial washout was 26% +/- 12% for normal walls and 15% +/- 8% for ischemic walls (p less than 0.001). Segmental analysis showed 48 and 46 ischemic segments at 1 and 3 hr, respectively. In conclusion, although only a few ischemic segments were missed at 3 hr, significantly lower ischemic/normal wall ratios were found at 1 hr. Faster myocardial washout from normal walls is responsible for the partial reduction of this ratio.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
0161-5505
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
32
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1961-5
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1991
pubmed:articleTitle
Technetium-99m-sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging in detection of coronary artery disease: comparison between initial (1-hour) and delayed (3-hour) postexercise images.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Canada.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study