Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/18308081
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2008-2-29
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Transperineal and transrectal prostate biopsy are both used for prostate cancer detection. However, which approach is superior remains unknown. In this study, we performed a prospective randomized study to compare the efficacy of transperineal versus transrectal 12-core initial prostate biopsy.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Feb
|
pubmed:issn |
1527-9995
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
71
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
191-5
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:18308081-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:18308081-Biopsy, Needle,
pubmed-meshheading:18308081-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:18308081-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:18308081-Perineum,
pubmed-meshheading:18308081-Prospective Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:18308081-Prostatic Neoplasms,
pubmed-meshheading:18308081-Rectum
|
pubmed:year |
2008
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Optimal approach for prostate cancer detection as initial biopsy: prospective randomized study comparing transperineal versus transrectal systematic 12-core biopsy.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Urology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan. ryoeih@med.kawasaki-m.ac.jp
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Randomized Controlled Trial
|